Radeon Rx 6600 Xt Vs Rtx 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Price now 991$
Games supported 100%
Cost at present 568$
Games supported 100%
General info
Comparison of graphics card architecture, market place segment, value for money and other full general parameters.
Place in performance rating | xi | 59 |
Value for money | 38.91 | 53.09 |
Architecture | Ampere (2020−2022) | Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022) |
GPU code name | Ampere GA104 | Navi 23 |
Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 16 September 2020 (i year ago) | 30 July 2021 (less than a yr ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $379 |
Price at present | $991 (2x MSRP) | $568 (1.5x MSRP) |
Value for money
To go the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU cadre base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and adding speed. These parameters indirectly speak of functioning, but for precise assessment you have to consider their criterion and gaming exam results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 5888 | no data |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | no information |
Number of transistors | 17,400 million | 11,060 million |
Manufacturing process technology | viii nm | vii nm |
Thermal pattern ability (TDP) | 220 Watt | no data |
Texture make full rate | 317.4 | 331.4 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional ability connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe four.0 x8 |
Length | 242 mm | 190 mm |
Width | two-slot | two-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | no data |
Retention
Parameters of retentivity installed: its blazon, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Notation that GPUs integrated into processors have no defended VRAM and use a shared role of system RAM.
Retentiveness type | GDDR6 | no data |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | no data |
Memory bus width | 256 Chip | no data |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | no data |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this department is precise only for desktop reference ones (then-chosen Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and blazon of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the menu itself.
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort |
HDMI | + | no information |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | no data |
Shader Model | half dozen.five | vi.v |
OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
OpenCL | two.0 | no data |
Vulkan | ane.two | no data |
CUDA | 8.v | no information |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Notation that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined criterion performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, just if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel gratis to speak up in comments section, nosotros commonly gear up problems speedily.
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
- 3DMark Vantage Performance
- 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
- Passmark
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX xi characteristic level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and bones notebooks. Information technology displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Simply similar Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced past 3DMark Dark Raid.
Fire Strike is a DirectX eleven criterion for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery animal seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Burn down Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abased temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being washed in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX x benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. Information technology taxes the graphics card with two scenes, 1 depicting a girl escaping some militarized base of operations located within a sea cave, the other displaying a infinite fleet attack on a caught planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Ice Tempest Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure out entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets functioning. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle betwixt two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics bill of fare a thorough evaluation under various load, providing iv split benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, eleven and 12 (the final being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more than tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming functioning
Let'due south see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Detail gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Hither are the average frames per second in a large set up of pop games beyond different resolutions:
Full HD | 146 | 131 |
1440p | 106 | 77 |
4K | 71 | 43 |
Total Hd
Medium Preset
Assassin'south Creed Odyssey | 125 +131% | 50−55 −131% |
Assassin'south Creed Valhalla | 100 −29% | 129 +29% |
Battlefield 5 | 149 +176% | 50−55 −176% |
Phone call of Duty: Mod Warfare | 75−eighty +40.7% | l−55 −40.seven% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 108 +47.9% | 73 −47.9% |
Far Cry 5 | 139 −eight.half dozen% | 151 +8.6% |
Far Weep New Dawn | 112 −17% | 131 +17% |
Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80 +40.7% | fifty−55 −40.vii% |
Hitman 3 | 171 −29.two% | 221 +29.ii% |
Horizon Zilch Dawn | 153 +11.7% | 137 −11.vii% |
Red Expressionless Redemption 2 | 156 +189% | 50−55 −189% |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 161 −3.1% | 166 +3.one% |
Lookout Dogs: Legion | 118 −1.7% | 120 +1.7% |
Full Hd
Loftier Preset
Assassinator'due south Creed Odyssey | 107 +98.1% | 50−55 −98.1% |
Assassinator's Creed Valhalla | 87 −21.8% | 106 +21.viii% |
Battleground five | 132 +144% | 50−55 −144% |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 75−lxxx +40.7% | fifty−55 −40.vii% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 93 +25.seven% | 74 −25.vii% |
Far Cry v | 133 −6% | 141 +six% |
Far Cry New Dawn | 112 −thirteen.4% | 127 +xiii.4% |
Forza Horizon iv | 75−80 +40.7% | 50−55 −40.seven% |
Hitman 3 | 166 −10.2% | 183 +10.two% |
Horizon Cypher Dawn | 130 +xix.3% | 109 −19.3% |
Metro Exodus | 117 +23.two% | 95 −23.2% |
Ruby Dead Redemption ii | 98 +81.5% | l−55 −81.5% |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 154 +8.5% | 142 −viii.five% |
The Witcher 3: Wild Chase | 224 +27.3% | 176 −27.3% |
Lookout man Dogs: Legion | 112 +7.7% | 104 −7.7% |
Full Hard disk drive
Ultra Preset
Assassinator's Creed Odyssey | 81 +fifty% | fifty−55 −fifty% |
Assassinator's Creed Valhalla | 78 +4% | 75 −four% |
Battlefield 5 | 119 +120% | fifty−55 −120% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 81 +28.6% | 63 −28.6% |
Far Weep v | 127 −4.7% | 133 +4.7% |
Far Cry New Dawn | 97 −xv.five% | 112 +xv.5% |
Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80 +40.vii% | 50−55 −twoscore.7% |
The Witcher 3: Wild Chase | 121 +22.ii% | 99 −22.2% |
Picket Dogs: Legion | 85 +39.3% | 61 −39.3% |
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 75−80 +40.7% | 50−55 −forty.7% |
Hitman 3 | 140 +25% | 112 −25% |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 107 +40.8% | 76 −40.8% |
Metro Exodus | 75 +33.ix% | 56 −33.9% |
Blood-red Dead Redemption 2 | 63 +xvi.seven% | fifty−55 −sixteen.7% |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 114 +35.vii% | 84 −35.7% |
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 68 +25.nine% | l−55 −25.ix% |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 65 +xvi.1% | 56 −16.ane% |
Battleground 5 | 103 +90.7% | l−55 −90.seven% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 54 +54.3% | 35 −54.3% |
Far Cry 5 | 113 +7.6% | 105 −7.half dozen% |
Far Cry New Dawn | 94 −4.3% | 98 +iv.3% |
Forza Horizon 4 | 75−eighty +forty.7% | 50−55 −twoscore.seven% |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 66 +l% | 44 −l% |
4K
Loftier Preset
Telephone call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 75−eighty +forty.7% | 50−55 −xl.seven% |
Hitman 3 | 78 +36.viii% | 57 −36.8% |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 69 +76.ix% | 39 −76.9% |
Metro Exodus | 49 +44.1% | 34 −44.1% |
Red Dead Redemption ii | 43 −25.vi% | fifty−55 +25.vi% |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 62 +55% | 40 −55% |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 89 +64.8% | 54 −64.8% |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 48 −12.v% | 50−55 +12.v% |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 43 +53.6% | 28 −53.6% |
Battlefield 5 | seventy +29.6% | 50−55 −29.6% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 27 +108% | 13 −108% |
Far Cry 5 | lxx +37.3% | 51 −37.3% |
Far Cry New Dawn | lxx +32.1% | 53 −32.1% |
Forza Horizon 4 | 75−eighty +xl.seven% | 50−55 −40.7% |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 39 +62.5% | 24 −62.five% |
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating | 75.30 | 53.79 |
Novelty | sixteen September 2020 | 30 July 2021 |
Cost | $499 | $379 |
Chip lithography | eight nm | vii nm |
Judging by the results of constructed and gaming tests, Technical City recommends
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
since it shows better functioning.
Should y'all still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, inquire them in Comments department, and we shall reply.
Cast your vote
Practice y'all think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button virtually your favorite graphics card.
Competitors of GeForce RTX 3070 by AMD
Nosotros believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce RTX 3070 from AMD is Radeon RX 6750 XT, which is slower by 3% and lower past 4 positions in our rating.
Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 3070:
Competitors of Radeon RX 6600 XT by NVIDIA
The nearest Radeon RX 6600 XT's NVIDIA equivalent is GeForce RTX 2070, which is faster by two% and higher by three positions in our rating.
Hither are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon RX 6600 XT:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of video cards with functioning more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.
User rating
Here you lot can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as charge per unit them yourself.
Questions and comments
Hither you tin ask a question about this comparison, concur or disagree with our judgements, or study an error or mismatch.
Graphics settings
Screen resolution
FPS
Radeon Rx 6600 Xt Vs Rtx 3070,
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-RTX-3070-vs-Radeon-RX-6600-XT
Posted by: smithgoeve1939.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Radeon Rx 6600 Xt Vs Rtx 3070"
Post a Comment